<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
 <title type="text">various fragments and filter failure: Posts tagged 'RFC'</title>
 <link rel="self" href="http://entangled.systems/feeds/RFC.atom.xml" />
 <link href="http://entangled.systems/tags/RFC.html" />
 <id>urn:http-entangled-systems:-tags-RFC-html</id>
 <updated>2022-03-21T11:31:55Z</updated>
 <entry>
  <title type="text">RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://entangled.systems/fragments/20220321-rfc8890-the-internet-is-for-end-users.html?utm_source=RFC&amp;utm_medium=Atom" />
  <id>urn:http-entangled-systems:-fragments-20220321-rfc8890-the-internet-is-for-end-users-html</id>
  <published>2022-03-21T11:31:55Z</published>
  <updated>2022-03-21T11:31:55Z</updated>
  <author>
   <name>zzkt</name></author>
  <content type="html">
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) has published RFC8890, The Internet is for End Users, arguing that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) should ground its decisions in what’s good for people who use the Internet, and that it should take positive steps to achieve that. Why does this need to be said? Is it going too far? Who else could they favour, and why should you care? As author of the RFC and a member of the IAB that passed it, here are my thoughts.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;via &lt;a href="https://www.mnot.net/blog/2020/08/28/for_the_users"&gt;https://www.mnot.net/blog/2020/08/28/for_the_users&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- tumblr url: [https://agalmic.org/post/679372511557943296](https://agalmic.org/post/679372511557943296)--&gt;</content></entry></feed>