<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>various fragments and filter failure: Posts tagged 'RFC'</title>
  <description>various fragments and filter failure: Posts tagged 'RFC'</description>
  <link>http://entangled.systems/tags/RFC.html</link>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:31:55 UT</lastBuildDate>
  <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:31:55 UT</pubDate>
  <ttl>1800</ttl>
  <item>
   <title>RFC8890: The Internet is for End Users</title>
   <link>http://entangled.systems/fragments/20220321-rfc8890-the-internet-is-for-end-users.html?utm_source=RFC&amp;utm_medium=RSS</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:http-entangled-systems:-fragments-20220321-rfc8890-the-internet-is-for-end-users-html</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:31:55 UT</pubDate>
   <author>zzkt</author>
   <description>
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) has published RFC8890, The Internet is for End Users, arguing that the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) should ground its decisions in what’s good for people who use the Internet, and that it should take positive steps to achieve that. Why does this need to be said? Is it going too far? Who else could they favour, and why should you care? As author of the RFC and a member of the IAB that passed it, here are my thoughts.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;via &lt;a href="https://www.mnot.net/blog/2020/08/28/for_the_users"&gt;https://www.mnot.net/blog/2020/08/28/for_the_users&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- tumblr url: [https://agalmic.org/post/679372511557943296](https://agalmic.org/post/679372511557943296)--&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>