<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> 
<rss version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>various fragments and filter failure: Posts tagged 'practice'</title>
  <description>various fragments and filter failure: Posts tagged 'practice'</description>
  <link>http://entangled.systems/tags/practice.html</link>
  <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:25:13 UT</lastBuildDate>
  <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:25:13 UT</pubDate>
  <ttl>1800</ttl>
  <item>
   <title>Innate Talents: Reality Or Myth?</title>
   <link>http://entangled.systems/fragments/20170313-innate-talents-reality-or-myth.html?utm_source=practice&amp;utm_medium=RSS</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:http-entangled-systems:-fragments-20170313-innate-talents-reality-or-myth-html</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:25:13 UT</pubDate>
   <author>zzkt</author>
   <description>
&lt;blockquote&gt;Talents that selectively facilitate the acquisition of high levels of skill are said to be present in some children but not others. The evidence for this includes biological correlates of specific abilities, certain rare abilities in autistic savants, and the seemingly spontaneous emergence of exceptional abilities in young children, but there is also contrary evidence indicating an absence of early precursors for high skill levels in young people. An analysis of positive and negative evidence and arguments suggests that differences in early experiences, preferences, opportunities, habits, training and practice are the real determinants of excellence. 
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;via &lt;a href="http://cogprints.org/656/1/innate.htm"&gt;http://cogprints.org/656/1/innate.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- tumblr url: [https://agalmic.org/post/158352579557](https://agalmic.org/post/158352579557)--&gt;</description></item>
  <item>
   <title>Crash: how computers are setting us up for disaster</title>
   <link>http://entangled.systems/fragments/20161017-crash-how-computers-are-setting-us-up-for-disaster.html?utm_source=practice&amp;utm_medium=RSS</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:http-entangled-systems:-fragments-20161017-crash-how-computers-are-setting-us-up-for-disaster-html</guid>
   <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:31:08 UT</pubDate>
   <author>zzkt</author>
   <description>
&lt;blockquote&gt;
 &lt;div&gt;This problem has a name: the paradox of automation. It applies in a wide variety of contexts, from the operators of nuclear power stations to the crew of cruise ships, from the simple fact that we can no longer remember phone numbers because we have them all stored in our mobile phones, to the way we now struggle with mental arithmetic because we are surrounded by electronic calculators. The better the automatic systems, the more out-of-practice human operators will be, and the more extreme the situations they will have to face. The psychologist James Reason, author of Human Error, wrote: “Manual control is a highly skilled activity, and skills need to be practised continuously in order to maintain them. Yet an automatic control system that fails only rarely denies operators the opportunity for practising these basic control skills … when manual takeover is necessary something has usually gone wrong; this means that operators need to be more rather than less skilled in order to cope with these atypical conditions.”
  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt; 
 &lt;div&gt;The paradox of automation, then, has three strands to it. First, automatic systems accommodate incompetence by being easy to operate and by automatically correcting mistakes. Because of this, an inexpert operator can function for a long time before his lack of skill becomes apparent – his incompetence is a hidden weakness that can persist almost indefinitely. Second, even if operators are expert, automatic systems erode their skills by removing the need for practice. Third, automatic systems tend to fail either in unusual situations or in ways that produce unusual situations, requiring a particularly skilful response. A more capable and reliable automatic system makes the situation worse.
  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;p&gt;via &lt;a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/11/crash-how-computers-are-setting-us-up-disaster"&gt;https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/11/crash-how-computers-are-setting-us-up-disaster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- tumblr url: [https://agalmic.org/post/151924286367](https://agalmic.org/post/151924286367)--&gt;</description></item>
  <item>
   <title>1. Take a quarterly vacation  2. Hold a “retrospective” after projects  3. Write every day  4. Create an “interesting people...</title>
   <link>http://entangled.systems/fragments/20150330-1-take-a-quarterly-vacation-2-hold-a-retrospective-after-projects-3-write-every-day-4-create-an-interesting-people.html?utm_source=practice&amp;utm_medium=RSS</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:http-entangled-systems:-fragments-20150330-1-take-a-quarterly-vacation-2-hold-a-retrospective-after-projects-3-write-every-day-4-create-an-interesting-people-html</guid>
   <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:51:17 UT</pubDate>
   <author>zzkt</author>
   <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="quote"&gt;“1. Take a quarterly vacation
  &lt;br /&gt; 2. Hold a “retrospective” after projects
  &lt;br /&gt; 3. Write every day
  &lt;br /&gt; 4. Create an “interesting people fund”
  &lt;br /&gt; 5. Keep “tear sheets” to get inspired
  &lt;br /&gt; 6. Nap every day
  &lt;br /&gt; 7. Envision what you will be remembered for
  &lt;br /&gt; 8. Brainstorm at the bar
  &lt;br /&gt; 9. Get out of the building
  &lt;br /&gt; 10. Engage in “morphological synthesis”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;–&lt;span class="quote-source"&gt;&lt;a href="http://99u.com/articles/21137/10-creative-rituals-you-should-steal"&gt;http://99u.com/articles/21137/10-creative-rituals-you-should-steal&lt;/a&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- tumblr url: [https://agalmic.org/post/115030510692](https://agalmic.org/post/115030510692)--&gt;</description></item>
  <item>
   <title>Four hours of concentration</title>
   <link>http://entangled.systems/fragments/20130206-four-hours-of-concentration.html?utm_source=practice&amp;utm_medium=RSS</link>
   <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:http-entangled-systems:-fragments-20130206-four-hours-of-concentration-html</guid>
   <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 13:57:12 UT</pubDate>
   <author>zzkt</author>
   <description>
&lt;blockquote&gt;Now we also know that if you study absolute world class, best virtuoso violin players, none of them put in more than about four or so hours of practice in a day, because that’s the cognitive limit. And this limit actually shows up in a lot of different fields where people do intense training, that you really can’t do about more than four or so hours of this type of really mental strain.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/04/four-hours-of-concentration/"&gt;http://www.johndcook.com/blog/2013/02/04/four-hours-of-concentration/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- tumblr url: [https://agalmic.org/post/42390030739](https://agalmic.org/post/42390030739)--&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>